A New Take on Matt Garza
Last year on Opening Day, the Cubs rotation (as hard as it is to believe) was actually looking pretty good. They had Ryan Dempster, a 15 game winner in 2010, at the top of their rotation. Then came the “new and improved” Carlos Zambrano and the winter acquisition of Matt Garza. In the 4 and 5 spots were Randy Wells and top prospect Andrew Cashner. Many Cubs fans cautiously dubbed the rotation as a strength.
Well, Cashner and Wells both went down in their first starts with the Cubs, Dempster won a disappointing 10 games, and Big Z was, well, Big Z. But the common belief between Cubs fans was that Matt Garza did alright. In fact, he was considered as the best pitcher on the Cubs, even though he only had 10 wins. In the words of Carrie Muskat, he was a “tough-luck pitcher”.
And with Garza trade rumors flying, I decided to take a look and get my own opinion on this guy’s value. And what I found surprised me. We all knew Garza was good. But after a little digging, I found out Matt’s 2011 season was phenomenal. I’m no Theo Epstein, but I think Matt Garza is seriously underrated. What I did was this:
MLB.com has a game log for every player in the major leagues. It shows every game they played and what they did in it. I simply went to Matt Garza’s game log, and looked at every start he had. I ignored if he won or lost, and just looked at how he did. I considered a start worth a win if he pitched six innings or more and gave up three runs or less. I kept a tally of his “deserved wins and losses”. And like I said, what I found shocked me.
Note: Unless you’re really interested in the stats, feel free to just look at the deserved wins and losses, because for the casual fan, this may get a little dry… The pictures are there for the same reason.
IP: 7.0 ER: 3 – deserved win
1 win, 0 losses
Start #2: April 9
IP: 5.2 ER: 5 – deserved loss
1 win, 1 loss
Start #3 April 15
IP: 6.0 ER: 5 – deserved loss
1 win, 2 losses
Start #4: April 20
IP: 6.0 ER: 0 – deserved win
2 win, 2 losses
Start #5: April 25
IP: 6 ER: 1 – deserved win
3 wins, 2 losses
Start #6: April 30
IP: 8.0 ER: 3 – deserved win
4 wins, 2 losses
IP: 6.0 ER: 5 – deserved loss
4 wins, 3 losses
Start #8: May 11
IP: 5.0 ER: 1 – deserved loss
4 wins, 4 losses
Start #9: May 17
IP: 6.0 ER: 0 – deserved win
5 wins, 4 losses
Start #10: June 6
IP: 4.0 ER: 4 – deserved loss
5 wins, 5 losses
Start #11: June 11
IP: 6.0 ER: 1 – deserved win
6 wins, 5 losses
Start #12: June 16
IP: 6.0 ER: 5 – deserved loss
6 wins, 6 losses
Start #13: June 21
IP: 5.0 ER: 2 -deserved loss
6 wins, 7 losses
Start #14: June 27
IP: 7.1 ER: 3 – deserved win
7 wins, 7 losses
IP: 9.0 ER: 1 – deserved win
8 wins, 7 losses
Start #16: July 7
IP: 2.0 ER: 6 – deserved loss
8 wins, 8 losses
Start #17: July 14
IP: 7.0 ER: 0 – deserved win
9 wins, 8 losses
Start #18: July 19
IP: 7.0 ER: 1 – deserved win
10 wins, 8 losses
Start #19: July 24
IP: 7.0 ER: 2 – deserved win
11 wins, 8 losses
IP: 5.2 ER: 6 – deserved loss
11 wins, 9 losses
Start #21: August 3
IP: 7.0 ER: 0 – deserved win
12 wins, 9 losses
Start #22: August 9
IP: 6.0 ER: 3 – deserved win
13 wins, 9 losses
Start #23: August 14
IP: 5.0 ER: 2 – deserved loss
13 wins, 10 losses
Start #24: August 20
IP: 7.0 ER: 0 – deserved win
14 wins, 10 losses
Start #25: August 25
IP: 5.0 ER: 3 – deserved loss
14 wins, 11 losses
Start #26: August 30
IP: 6.2 ER: 2 – deserved win
15 wins, 11 losses
IP: 7.0 ER: 1 – deserved win
16 wins, 11 losses
Start #28: September 11
IP: 7.0 ER: 3 – deserved win
17 wins, 11 losses
Start #29: September 16
IP: 9.0 ER: 3 – deserved win
18 wins, 11 losses
Start #30: September 21
IP: 9.0 ER: 0 – deserved win
19 wins, 11 losses
Start #31: September 27
IP: 7.0 ER: 2 – deserved win
20 wins, 11 losses
That’s right. Over the whole season, if Matt Garza would have had the run support (average runs scored per game in 2011 was 4.6) and the bullpen could hold his leads… He would have a 20 win season. To put that in perspective, Clayton Kershaw won the NL Cy Young with 21 wins.
Now, I’m not saying we should strip Kershaw of his Cy Young and give it to Garza. All I’m saying is that Garza is not the 10 win pitcher he’s made out to be. He’s much, much more. Trade rumors have been swirling around, but I think many times the best move a team can make is to hold on to their players. And on a team full of mediocre pitching, Garza is one guy the Cubs need to keep.





I agree with you on Garza. I watched him pitch last year and lamented every time the bullpen blew a lead or the team didn’t score runs for him. It was frustrating watching him give a great effort and see his team lose it. I would love for us to keep him, but if we do trade him I know we would get a lot in return.
Ron
He is a very good pitcher. Having him pitch on a team out of the Central would be nice.
Welcome to the MLB Blogsphere!
I know what you mean about Garza. Kuroda was in the same boat with the Dodgers. He got poor run support. Kershaw also won some low scoring games. Kershaw won every start against Lincecum. Dodger offense was anemic. Kershaw deserved winning the Cy Young.
Emma
I watched Kershaw several times last season, and it seemed like every time I turned on the TV he was shutting out some team. He’s crazy good…
Pingback: this article « Century and Counting